<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>inspire: retail design blog &#187; Pepsi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspiredesignblog.co.uk/category/pepsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspiredesignblog.co.uk</link>
	<description>brand new thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Branding = consistency</title>
		<link>http://inspiredesignblog.co.uk/2009/07/28/branding-consistency/</link>
		<comments>http://inspiredesignblog.co.uk/2009/07/28/branding-consistency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspiredesignblog.co.uk/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had this post at the back of mind for a long time and reading this post on We Heart Branding about the difference between Pepsi and Coca-Cola has brought it to the front. It boils down to one things over the years &#8230; consistency. Surely though the graph can&#8217;t be true? Has Coca-Cola really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="max-width: 800px;" src="http://www.inspiredesignblog.co.uk/images/CNevUU7WPq9xv6juSccScl2Wo1_500.jpg" alt="" /><br />
I&#8217;ve had this post at the back of mind for a long time and reading <a href="http://weheartbranding.com/post/148659963/coke-pepsi-logos" target="_blank">this post on We Heart Branding</a> about the difference between Pepsi and Coca-Cola has brought it to the front. It boils down to one things over the years &#8230; consistency. Surely though the graph can&#8217;t be true? Has Coca-Cola really been the same since 1886? Well it seems so. A little googling brings you to the history of Coca-Cola on their <a href="http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com/heritage/chronicle_birth_refreshing_idea.html" target="_blank">corporate website</a> (worth reading from the point of view about how they gave free samples away at the beginning) and a few other pieces of their logo history.</p>
<p>The main message here is to be consistent. You don&#8217;t need to change or tweak your logo every few years, add some shine, shift the colours, make it 3D or use the latest photoshop/illustrator technique tweak or round the corners or add a drop shadow to make it web 2.0 or whatever the latest internet led logo fad is.</p>
<p>What you can do is add to the story, add that extra layer, think how the BBC works. BBC channels exist as a layer beneath the main BBC identity and each has it&#8217;s own distinctive style and colour, the idents between programmes serving to give that quick reminder of where you are, the redness and to a lesser extent the circle/globe spreading through the channel, including the news.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.inspiredesignblog.co.uk/images/bbcone.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="498" /></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re story is wrong or not well thought through or a little frayed around the edges, or perhaps you&#8217;re tired of telling it and your customers are tired of hearing it. That&#8217;s where you need to change. Although, more often than not it&#8217;s not the logo that&#8217;s an issue it&#8217;s how it&#8217;s been used and abused and fallen into the trap of becoming an excercise in design or marketing vanity. You hear it often enough, &#8220;let&#8217;s tweak the logo&#8221;, &#8220;can we look at some different colours and typefaces&#8221; (how scientific!). How about don&#8217;t. How about getting back to the origins of the identity, using the guidelines that it came with and creating a better story that underpins the logo, so your customers can create your brand.</p>
<p>I go along with <a title="Jacob Cass on Just Creative Design, what makes a good logo" href="http://justcreativedesign.com/2009/07/27/what-makes-a-good-logo/" target="_blank">Jacob Cass on Just Creative Design</a> that a good logo/identity is:</p>
<ul>
<li>Simple</li>
<li>Memorable</li>
<li>Timeless</li>
<li>Versatile</li>
<li>Appropriate</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll add into this that a good logo should:</p>
<ul>
<li>Provide clear identification</li>
<li>Stand for your message and values</li>
<li>Be an internal focal point</li>
<li>Stand you apart your competition</li>
<li>Be credible</li>
<li>Create order</li>
<li>Create merchandising opportunities (maybe)</li>
</ul>
<p>More Coca-Cola/Pepsi:<br />
<a href="http://www.logoblog.org/coca_cola_logo.php" target="_blank">Logoblog.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.landor.com/index.cfm?do=aboutus.cocacolacase&amp;bhcp=1" target="_blank">Landor &#8211; Refreshing an iconic visual identity</a></p>
<p>More logo design stuff:<br />
<a title="Brand New website" href="http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/" target="_blank">Brand New</a><br />
<a title="Logo Design Love" href="http://www.logodesignlove.com/" target="_blank">Logo Design Love</a><br />
<a title="David Airey" href="http://www.davidairey.com/category/logos/" target="_blank">David Airey</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredesignblog.co.uk/2009/07/28/branding-consistency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
