The majority of people worldwide wouldn’t care if 73% of brands disappeared tomorrow.
Is that all?
]]>Of particular note, a large use of fresh (some might say Asda) green and a very architectural girder or two that run through the space.
Fascia with entrance 'you are here' graphics and plant barrow to the right.
Interior with the big green girder
'Market fresh' produce with ubiquitous hand written blackboard graphics, one day someone will actually write these kind of things by hand
Salad bar close up
Spotted on LSN Global and Popsop and Fitch
]]>One way of changing the environment without watering down the brand is to use found and refurbished objects, fixtures and fittings that are in keeping with the overall brand identity.
Graphics often becomes less important and the objects and furniture more valuable. How this style of retail will stand the test of time I’m not sure, it needs constant reinvention and reiteration to keep it fresh rather than the usual complete refit every five years or so.
A few examples of some more individual ‘third places':
Roy Street Coffee and Tea by Starbucks
Originally from: Furfin
15th Avenue E Coffee and Tea by Starbucks
Originally from: Furfin
The Chin Chin Laboratorists
Originally from: Dezeen
Red Wing Shoes, Amsterdam
Originally from: Furfin
Starbucks concept store, Conduit Street London
Originally from: PSFK
And on this blog …
]]>Now a gallery it’s got it’s own website www.riflemaker.org and is available for hire.
Also worth looking at his flickr group of the café. The Rapha website’s not too shabby either and a nice video on Monocle.
These days there’s no reason not to have a shop, a pop up shop, a twitter, a facebook page, a van, go to festivals, write a book, a photo essay, a magazine, have a loyalty card, a website, a microsite, a tumblr, a flavors.me, print a t-shirt the list goes on. Brands that market themselves as authentic and have an idea win. Those that buy off the shelf and stick their logo on, fail.
Update: just came across another piece about Rapha here on everydaylife.style loads more to explore on there too.
Links:
Logorama essay by Adrian Shaughnessy
Logorama slideshow by Adrian Shaughnessy
Stills and interview with Francois Alaux and Hervé de Crécy of H5
]]>The first set of pictures shows the ‘dch’ (danesi coffee house) concept, ” … a real tasting place to experience the original Italian espresso and distribute new “coffee culture” products; each one is located in large city centres.”
What I particularly like in the interiors is the calmness and structure that’s provided by the overall colour palette but carried through to the straightforward large image that’s used and the furniture with its cutaway details and chairs with mini shelves.
My favourite feature though is the lighting, especially the lampshades that cut through the ceiling raft above the counter. All very calm and elegant. As usual it’s the attention to detail that makes places like these work.
The Danesi website is also worth a browse to see the products as well as all elements you would need to create your franchise.
The second set of pictures shows the ‘dsao’ (danesi small architectural object) concept, “a small coffee corner, conceived as independent platforms, ready to be located inside malls, airports, railway stations and trade shows.”
I’ve had this post at the back of mind for a long time and reading this post on We Heart Branding about the difference between Pepsi and Coca-Cola has brought it to the front. It boils down to one things over the years … consistency. Surely though the graph can’t be true? Has Coca-Cola really been the same since 1886? Well it seems so. A little googling brings you to the history of Coca-Cola on their corporate website (worth reading from the point of view about how they gave free samples away at the beginning) and a few other pieces of their logo history.
The main message here is to be consistent. You don’t need to change or tweak your logo every few years, add some shine, shift the colours, make it 3D or use the latest photoshop/illustrator technique tweak or round the corners or add a drop shadow to make it web 2.0 or whatever the latest internet led logo fad is.
What you can do is add to the story, add that extra layer, think how the BBC works. BBC channels exist as a layer beneath the main BBC identity and each has it’s own distinctive style and colour, the idents between programmes serving to give that quick reminder of where you are, the redness and to a lesser extent the circle/globe spreading through the channel, including the news.
If you’re story is wrong or not well thought through or a little frayed around the edges, or perhaps you’re tired of telling it and your customers are tired of hearing it. That’s where you need to change. Although, more often than not it’s not the logo that’s an issue it’s how it’s been used and abused and fallen into the trap of becoming an excercise in design or marketing vanity. You hear it often enough, “let’s tweak the logo”, “can we look at some different colours and typefaces” (how scientific!). How about don’t. How about getting back to the origins of the identity, using the guidelines that it came with and creating a better story that underpins the logo, so your customers can create your brand.
I go along with Jacob Cass on Just Creative Design that a good logo/identity is:
- Simple
- Memorable
- Timeless
- Versatile
- Appropriate
I’ll add into this that a good logo should:
- Provide clear identification
- Stand for your message and values
- Be an internal focal point
- Stand you apart your competition
- Be credible
- Create order
- Create merchandising opportunities (maybe)
More Coca-Cola/Pepsi:
Logoblog.org
Landor – Refreshing an iconic visual identity
More logo design stuff:
Brand New
Logo Design Love
David Airey